I was MC at the meeting. I was invited to explain aged care reforms.
Professor Rob Watts spoke at the forum. Rob has agreed for me to share his talk, for those who may be interested.
Download Report LivingWellAgedCareHome
We hear a lot of heart-breaking stories about neglect and abuse in aged care homes. We hear much less about older people who are living happily.
“The most reliable indication that residents are living well is their demeanour”, says Dr Sarah Russell, a public health researcher and aged care advocate. “Families are reassured when residents are happy, well groomed, pleased to see staff members and call the aged care home their “home”.
Dr Russell collected more than 170 personal stories from relatives who visit an aged care home. Relatives described what was good about the aged care home, and what was not good. They also made suggestions about how to improve the quality of life of residents. These stories provide a rich source of experiences to inform policy.
“The report is unsettling to read in parts, but that is its value and significance”, says Dr Russell. “In a system where policy and practice is dominated by perspectives of providers and professional groups, it is unique to hear the experiences of people who regularly visit an aged care home. These personal stories have the power to influence decision makers.”
Some relatives described older people being happier in an aged care home than when they lived at home alone. They have company, regular meals and an opportunity to be engaged in different activities.
“The key to high quality care in an aged care home is competent caring staff,” says Dr Russell. “Problems occur when there is not enough staff.”
During the past decade there has been a decrease in registered and enrolled nurses working in aged care homes and an increase in personal care attendants.
“There is strong evidence of a correlation between registered nurses and standards of care”, says Dr Russell. “Registered nurses are trained to manage complex health conditions. Having registered nurses on duty not only improves clinical management but also prevent admissions to hospital. This is important for both the resident and the public purse”.
Relatives want the federal government to legislate staff-resident ratios and skill prerequisites in all aged care homes. “There is currently legislation in childcare centres but not aged care homes.”
Relatives claim the care of vulnerable older people should not be left in the hands of providers seeking to maximise profits. They believe effective regulation and increased transparency will help to prevent neglect in aged care homes. “We cannot simply rely on providers doing the right thing.”
This research demonstrates why the federal government must make systemic changes so the community can be reassured that all residents in all aged care homes receive an acceptable standard of care.
Download Report LivingWellAgedCareHome
In recent years, there have been numerous heart-breaking stories about aged care homes. When stories about inadequate personal care, neglect, abuse and negligence are reported in the media, the aged care industry dismisses these stories as ‘one-offs’. But are they?
To answer this question, we need data from people who have first-hand experiences in aged care homes – residents, relatives and staff. They know what day-to-day life is like in aged care homes.
There is a link to a survey for staff the end of this article.
If we want to improve the situation for residents, we need more registered nurses in aged care homes. When registered nurses are on duty, residents have better health outcomes, a higher quality of life and fewer hospital admissions.
To ensure an evidence-based approach to aged care policy and practice, we need research evidence rather than more inquiries, reviews, taskforces and think tanks that privilege stakeholder opinions.
To be able to evaluate the proportion of aged care homes that provide high standards of care, researchers like myself need access to data. We need data on quality indicators such as pressure sores, medication errors, weight loss, falls, infection rates admissions to hospitals, staffing levels and training. However, these data are not publicly available.
Who decided that data on residents’ safety and wellbeing in aged care homes must be kept top secret? To answer this question, we need to go back more than 20 years when the Aged Care Act 1997 was drafted. John Howard’s Coalition government proved a turning point for aged care policy in Australia.
I recently asked politicians, CEOs of peak bodies that represent aged care homes, unions and aged care advocates to tell me whether they support/oppose minimum ratios of registered nurses in aged care homes and why they take this position. This is their response.
How many inquiries, reviews, taskforces, think tanks, consultations and consultant reports does it take for the government to change a light bulb in an aged care home? Over the past year or so, the government has investigated, among other things, the aged care workforce, reforms, accreditation, complaints scheme, innovation, standards of care and elder abuse – and still the light globe remains unchanged.
Aged care homes are places where our most vulnerable older people live. How do we ensure the highest possible standards of care?
More than 160,000 Australians live in an aged care home. Recent media reports have highlighted inadequate personal care, neglect, abuse and negligence suggesting that the quality of care in some aged care homes is a disgrace.